Archive for August, 2009

According to the Treasury Secretary, the United States’ economy has pulled away from the edge of collapse.

Timothy Geithner made this evaluation after watching a week of positive economic indicators, according to CNN.com, and he believes the country can expect continued economic improvement for the rest of 2009.

Less Job Loss, More Jobs To Come?

Job losses should slow, and job creation could begin as early as 2010.

To bridge the gap between the end of the recession and the end of the recovery, Geithner says the government plans to extend unemployment benefits that are currently keeping millions of Americans out of poverty and bankruptcy.

Some Economic Reality, Too

The news was not all good. Geithner acknowledged in an interview on ABC’s “This Week” that due to the recent emergency measures that seemingly saved the economy, the same economy is now significantly vulnerable to expanding deficit levels.

“We will not get this economy back on track, recovery will not be strong and sustained, unless we…can convince the American people that we’re going to have the will to bring these deficits down once recovery is firmly established,” the Treasury Secretary said on CNN.

Tax Increases?

Geithner did not rule out future tax increases as one possible strategy to address the deficit issue.

He reported that the President’s administration was dedicated to fixing the problem, and would not take anything off the table.

The next day, during a briefing with the press corps, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs clarified, stating that the President had already ruled out any tax increases on the middle class (those making under $250,000 per year).

Some Republicans have begun to acknowledge some improvement, but are not eager to give Democratic policies credit.

Rep. Mike Pence (IN) says that progress has happened "in spite of the prescriptions of Washington".

“I think what we’re seeing in the economy now is the inherent resilience of the American economy and the American people.

"This piecemeal approach—government handouts through a government bureaucracy—is no substitute for broad-based tax relief and fiscal discipline in Washington,” Pence told CNN.

Republican Sen. John McCain (AZ), who has spent more time opposing Obama than most of his colleagues, acknowledged that the $787 billion economic stimulus has had an effect, but voiced continued criticism that the cost was probably not worth the benefits in the long run.

“I think it’s very clear that the stimulus has had some effect,” McCain said. “But we have put trillions of additional debt on future generations of Americans. The long-term consequences, I think, are going to be, unfortunately, devastating unless we do something about it.”

Successful Cash for Clunkers Program Running on Fumes

Another stimulus-based proposal, the so-called “Cash for Clunkers” program that provides rebates to people trading in old cars for more fuel-efficient models, symbolizes the current debate.

The program, which was initially budgeted for $1 billion, has already exhausted its cash reserve, as car buyers flock to mostly American companies to trade in their vehicles.

Demand has exceeded supply, and now some Democrats want to extend the program, at a cost of $2 billion.

Some Republicans say the results aren’t clear enough to justify an additional expenditure.

Still, the program has lowered the miles-per-gallon rating of its participants’ vehicles by nearly 10 miles on average and Ford Motor Company reported some of its best sales numbers in years after the program went into effect.

Source: CNN.com

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

When she needed money for personal and professional projects, famed photographer Annie Leibovitz did what many people do: She took out a loan.

Only this loan was for more than $24 million and she put up a decades' worth of her artwork, along with her Greenwich Village townhouses, as collateral to the Art Capital Group, a notorious lender int he art world.

Now, she's defaulted on the loan, leaving the future of her photographs and townhouses up in the air.

Leibovitz is famed for her ability to capture the focus and intent of her subjects through a lens. Up to this point, Leibovitz gained notoriety and fame from her trend-setting, and often times prolific, visages of contemporary stars and starlets.

Her iconic photographs include a pregnant Demi Moore for the cover of "Vanity Fair" and a nude John Lennon on the day of his death.

Leibovitz’s finances seem to have been in turmoil long before any recent press on the matter. In February 2009 Leibovitz borrowed $15.5 million. As collateral she put up not only her several houses, but the rights to all of her photographs.

Putting up the future rights to art is rare because the future value of such works could be priceless. As a recent article surrounding the same subject the New York Times noted:

"One of the world’s most successful photographers essentially pawned every snap of the shutter she had made or will make until the loans are paid off.”

In July 2009, in connection with the February loan, a breach of contract lawsuit against Leibovitz was filed in the amount of $24 million regarding the repayment of these loans with the plaintiff on record being the Art Capital Group Inc. Art Capital allows clients to discreetly get loans in using artwork as collateral.

Art Capital states, in part, that they feel “Leibovitz will be unable to satisfy their obligations on the maturity date - a point that was discussed and acknowledged by the parties at the outset of the restructuring.” This was back in June 2008 when Leibovitz first approached them regarding her financial needs.

Eventually securing the loan in September of the same year, Leibovitz soon after apparently withdrew $5 million of a $22 million credit line. Then in December when, according to Art Capital, an extension of the original credit line was given to Leibovitz, totaling the loan to $24 million at which point Art Capital then granted her the remaining $18.9 million.

What happens now? According to the sources close to the incident, Leibovitz must settle up the $24 million, plus unpaid interest and other fees, by Sept. 8. This being the major point behind the lawsuit filed by Art Capital since they strongly believe this can’t be done without sales of Leibovitz’s collateral: Her artworks, photography archives and real estate in Greenwich Village and Rhinebeck, New York.

Could filing bankruptcy protect Leibovitz's art? It's unclear. Because the loans were tied to specific collateral, the loans may be considered secure and treated like a home loan. While bankruptcy does offer property protections, this is an unusually large loan with atypically high stakes.

Regardless, I'd guess she will explore every avenue possible to hang on to her life's work.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

It’s a fast-paced world out there and it may seem like things change too quickly to keep track of. Here are three important updates to help you stay on top of your finances:

1. Big-Time False Charges on Credit Cards

Credit.com reports that two customers in recent months were charged $23 quadrillion for small credit card purchases (like a pack of cigarettes)!

Although your credit card company would most certainly alert you if such a monster charge showed up, you might not be informed if the charge amount was slightly less egregious.

To make sure you aren’t being charged more than necessary:

  • Check and save receipts: Before signing a credit card receipt, make sure the dollar amount is what you expected. And hang onto receipts from debit and credit card buys. That way, you’ll have your own record to check against bills. You may be surprised at what you find.
  • Scrutinize your bills: Set aside a time to open mail from your bank and card issuers and check each item carefully. As soon as you spot an incorrect charge, alert the proper authorities so it can be corrected.

2. Teens Scrambling to Get Credit Cards

When the Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights goes into effect next year, those younger than 21 will require parental permission to open credit cards.

This means that 18-, 19- and 20-year-olds will have to jump through some hurdles if they want to have plastic of their own.

  • The plus side: This provision may protect many college-age teens from racking up enormous credit card debt without fully understanding their financial obligations and will likely put an end to card issuers aggressively marketing on college campuses.
  • The downside: Without a credit card, it’s hard to establish a credit history, which may mean young adults may not be able to get a lease, utilities, a car loan or other essentials.

Under-21s who think they’d like a credit card should apply now – but only after making sure they understand how their card operates and how to stay out of debt.

3. More Food for Same Price

msnbc.com reports that, thanks to lowered ingredient prices, many supermarket buys (especially those found in the snack aisle) have increased in value recently.

Last year, many food manufacturers reduced package sizes rather than increasing prices (noticed a change in your cereal boxes?), but now that the economy is struggling and prices for basics like corn and oil are lower, the opposite is happening.

Sources indicate that the shift will likely be most noticeable for chips and other snack-type foods.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

Unfortunately, some people have seen the abysmal housing situation in the U.S. as an opportunity to take money from struggling individuals and families.

We’ve written often about the many guises of foreclosure rescue scams and how to protect your home from foreclosure.

In July, the Federal Trade Commission announced Operation Loan Lies, a “coordinated national law enforcement effort to crack down on mortgage modification scams.”

178 Companies Targeted for Scams

Operation Loan Lies includes four separate lawsuits, meaning that the FTC will have started action in 14 separate cases since April.

Typically, a foreclosure rescue scam works like this to separate unsuspecting homeowners from their money:

  • Promise to help: Scammers typically claim to be able to halt, prevent or delay foreclosure or modify the terms of your home loan. Their message attracts those who are having difficulty making payments and are growing desperate to save their homes.
  • Demand for money – or more: Once a scammer has promised to assist his victim, he asks for payment up front or assures the homeowner that he can only help if the deed to the house is in his name.
  • Fail to follow through: Scammers then do little or nothing to help the distressed homeowner. Some leave town with the money; others evict the family once they have the rights to their property.

While such a scheme may seem blatantly suspicious in writing, to those in danger of losing their homes, the promises of these scammers often sound like the only good news they’ve heard in a long time.

Learning from Others’ Mistakes

The FTC’s game plan goes beyond legal action: it has created and posted a foreclosure warning video, which features people who were victimized by foreclosure rescue scams and provides information about how to deal with the threat of foreclosure.

FTC is Following Through

In early April of this year, a number of consumer advocates (including Attorney General Eric Holder, FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and others) announced that they planned to increase enforcement against people preying on distressed homeowners.

This move seems to be evidence that they’re following through.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

It’s no secret that the current economic woes of this country (and much of the world) can be traced to the U.S. housing market – which is why updates about home sales are watched so closely by those looking for indicators about where the economy is headed.

The Department of Commerce recently announced that sales of residential buildings increased by a healthy 11% in June, a figure well above the 2.3% widely predicted.

Here are some hard facts:

  • New home sales in June increased 11% from May.
  • The month-to-month jump was the largest recorded in the past nine years.
  • Compared to June of 2008, sales fell 21.3%.
  • The South was the only region of the country in which home sales decreased (by 5%).
  • Existing home sales increased 3.6% in June, marking a third consecutive month of increases.

Tax Incentive Enticing Buyers

Analysts have suggested that the jumps can likely be attributed to a combination of low prices and interest rates and the one-time $8,000 tax credit available to first-time buyers who purchase before November of this year.

Home production has greatly slowed since the boom months and the number of new homes currently on the market is at its lowest level since 1998, according to sources.

Despite these figures, the market still has more than eight months’ worth of houses (if buying continues at its current rate).

That’s higher than the “ideal” six-month supply, but an improvement over May’s 10.2 months’ worth.

Competition Steep for New Homes

Sources indicate that part of the problem facing new home sales is the bargains available from foreclosure properties, short sales and sales of existing homes that have been on the market a while.

Put another way, even though last month’s numbers beat many expectations, a normal (not boom) year typically sees three times as many new home sales.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!