Archive for September, 2009

Tuesday, September 29th, 2009

5 Reasons to File Chapter 13

This guest blog entry was written by David Chang of Chang & Carlin, LLP. Chang & Carlin offer bankruptcy and real estate legal services for Chicago and its suburbs. Read David Chang's blog at http://changandcarlin.blogspot.com/

Many debtors view Chapter 7 bankruptcy as the "better" type of bankruptcy to file, and that Chapter 13 is forced upon them by the courts. However, filing bankruptcy under Chapter 13 has many benefits.

Here are 5 major reasons why people may choose file for Chapter 13 bankruptcy:

  1. Chapter 13 has protections designed to stop a foreclosure or repossession.
  2. Chapter 13 bankruptcy can protect an asset that would otherwise not be protected in Chapter 7, and would be sold to pay creditors.
  3. The debtor makes too much money to file for Chapter 7, and would not be able to file otherwise.
  4. The debtor has recently had debts discharged in a Chapter 7 case and is not eligible to file again.
  5. Chapter 13 can consolidate debts that would not be dischargeable in a typical Chapter 7 bankruptcy case.
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Thank goodness psychologists keep researching human behavior – thanks to their studies, we can know how and why we spend money on stuff we don’t need. Here are some tips (adapted from the book Predictably Irrational) for avoiding classic marketing and behavior traps that may lead to bad financial decisions.

Admit It: You Procrastinate

We all put off chores if at all possible (this is why fast food exists). Rather than assuming your behavior will change anytime soon, plan for procrastination.

  • Avoid free trials. Most free trials automatically enroll you in a service you have to pay for when the trial ends. You could, of course, cancel the free service at some point – but that takes planning and effort. Either avoid such services or set up a system to remind yourself to cut them off.
  • Watch out for convenience store prices. Convenience stores are so called because they’re just that – convenient. While it may be tempting to grab a gallon of milk or a few bars of soap while you’re picking up a prescription, resist the urge. You’ll save money by shopping in regular grocery outlets, even if it’s a little more out of the way.

Keep an Open Mind

  • Rely on your own judgment. If you’ve heard good (or bad) things about a brand or an object, you may be more likely to interpret your experience in that framework. But try to keep an open mind – you may find a less-expensive version of something that suits your needs just fine.
  • Sift through the lingo. Products touted as premium or professional grade often tempt us because they sound like they’re high quality. But remember that these words have no quantifiable meaning – the way they work is what matters.

Remember: Cost Does Not Equal Quality

There’s a joke that goes, A man will pay two dollars for a one-dollar item he needs. A woman will pay one dollar for a two-dollar item she doesn’t need. While arguably sexist, this illustrates an important point.

  • Don’t equate price with value: An item is not a bargain if you don’t need it. Similarly, if you must have something, it’s worthwhile to spend money on it.
  • Know when you’ve erred: Sometimes, we don’t want to admit we spent too much for something. But doing so allows us to see our mistakes and hopefully improve our behavior in the future – and maybe even get a refund.

Make Your Money Work for You

Whether you're saving up money for a vacation, creating an emergency fund, or learning to stick with a budget after filing bankruptcy, it's important to make every dollar work for you. By avoid these common pitfalls, you may be able to reach your goals with your budget – and your sanity – intact.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Saturday, September 26th, 2009

CFED Releases State Financial Report Cards

In late September, the Center for Enterprise Development released data reflecting extensive research on economic conditions in all fifty states. The findings reveal alarming realities about the current financial situation for millions of Americans.

Summary of the Findings

The CFED introduces its findings with the analogy of a house built on sand, claiming that, even when our economy was booming, wealth disparities between the very rich and the poor prevented the country from being truly economically healthy.

The study found, among other things:

  • Racial disparities: Minority households are more than three times as likely as white households to have a high-cost mortgage, more than twice as likely to be “asset poor” (with insufficient funds to sustain them in crisis), and four times as likely to be unbanked.
  • Wealth gap: The difference between wealthy and poor Americans is enormous – for every dollar owned by a household in the highest fifth of wealth, families in the lowest fifth own only two cents.
  • Gender differences: Households headed by females make only 83 cents for every dollar earned by male-headed households.
  • Revolving debt jump: Since 2007 – 2008, when the last “scorecard” was released by the CFED, median revolving debt has increased by 64 percent, to nearly $3,000.

Policy Suggestions from the Report

With the findings, the CFED also included suggestions for policies to correct or improve the economic disparities. Specifically, the suggestions include:

  • Earned Income Tax Credits and Individual Development Accounts: These would encourage families to set money aside by giving them tax breaks for putting part of their incomes in savings
  • Protections from Predatory Lenders: The CFED recommends that more states adopt lending caps for payday lenders and other restrictions on predatory loans.
  • Financial Literacy Education: To increase general knowledge about and understanding of economic tools and policies, the Center recommends instituting mandatory financial literacy education in public schools.

Learn More

For a detailed look at the findings in your state, you can check out the interactive map on the Center’s website. Get started by clicking on your state and checking out the numbers recorded. You may want to compare your state to others in your region to see how you stack up.

If your finances have deteriorated, you may want to consider speaking with a local attorney about your bankruptcy options. Millions of Americans have been able to stop creditor harassment, eliminate credit card debt and stop foreclosure by filing bankruptcy

Additional Resources

2009 – 2010 Assets Opportunity Scorecard (PDF)

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Check out this infographic on filing bankruptcy & foreclosure:

Bankruptcy and Foreclosure Rates for The U.S. in 2009

Bankruptcy and Foreclosure Rates for The U.S. in 2009

Check out bankruptcy and foreclosure statistics by state.
Startling statistics about filing bankruptcy and foreclosure in America this year:

  • A foreclosure action is taken every 10 seconds. There were 1,528,364 total foreclosure actions taken in the first half of 2009.
  • An individual files bankruptcy every 22 seconds There were 699,104 total personal bankruptcy filings in the first half of 2009.
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Thursday, September 24th, 2009

Bankruptcy Class Action Law Suit Continues

When you successfully exit bankruptcy protection, you receive a full discharge of your debts. This means that creditors can no longer come after you for those debts. Likewise, these debts should be fully cleared from your credit report because they are no longer outstanding. As far as the courts are concerned, they've been settled.

Unfortunately, that's not how it always works. In fact, over the years, millions of people who filed for bankruptcy continued to see “charge-off” or “120 days late” appear on their credit reports from the major credit score companies.

On Aug. 31, millions of affected Americans were sent a notice that they may soon receive their share of the settlement.

The three main credit bureaus offered a $45 million settlement. However, that works out to about $1 per person affected.

Lawyers involved have filed a motion that aims to increase the amount of money paid out to those affected. They are hoping to get a favorable ruling from the judge, or a new offer from the credit bureaus.

If after successfully filing bankruptcy, you were able to exit with your debts discharged, but still saw "charge-off" or "120 days late" statements on your credit report, you may want to get in touch with Robert Weed. Check out his site at: http://stopthebankruptcydischargesettlement.com/

If we hear of further updates to this major bankruptcy case we'll provide an update.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Thursday, September 24th, 2009

Does Your Address Affect Your Credit Limit?

A recent report from msnbc.com suggests that your state of residence could affect your borrowing capability. A California man reportedly received a letter in the mail from one of his creditors informing him that his credit limit had been cut – simply because he lived in California

Since the economic crisis began more than a year ago, Americans have seen their credit limits slashed for a variety of reasons – a company’s economic distress, job loss, late payments, filing bankruptcy – but basing limit cuts on where someone lives seems unnecessary.

How It Happens

If you’re like the man in the article, you’ll receive a letter from your creditor informing you that your limit has been lowered. A call to a customer service representative may reveal the reasons why. But there may be no warning signs.

Generally, creditors cut limits for a variety of reasons:

  • Missed or late payments: If you have a history of not getting payments in on time, your card issuer may limit your ability to charge.
  • Universal default: If you default on another (unrelated) line of credit, some card issuers may see this as a warning sign and cut your limit. (New credit laws will end this practice in February, 2010)
  • Approaching your limit: Ironically, if you begin to approach your credit limit, you may be viewed as a riskier consumer and therefore have your limit cut.
  • Your credit score: If your credit report or score reflects risky behavior (missed payments, increased interest rates, other lowered limits), card issuers may cut your limit.
  • Financial struggles: As the recent economic situation has illustrated, your limit may be cut simply because your card issuer wants to cut its risk.

The recently introduced Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights may end some kinds of credit limit lowering, but most of the provisions of that law won’t take effect until 2010.

Is My State at Risk?

To know whether or not to be on the lookout for residence-based credit limit changes, you may want to check out the findings of the Corporation for Enterprise Development, which recently released economic data on all fifty states.

The group’s website includes an interactive map that allows you to view economic indicators for your states and compare it to other states to get an idea of where you fall in the national rankings.

The Lesson: Read Your Mail

Whenever you get mail from a credit card issuer, be sure to read it carefully – it could have important information about your credit future or cause you to file bankruptcy!

Additional Resources

Credit Cardholders' Bill of Rights (Summary) (PDF)

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009

10 Companies that Could Face Bankruptcy

Last week, Yahoo Finance had an interesting article about 10 big companies with troubled finances.

Citing a report by Audit Integrity, an independent corporate accounting researcher, these 10 publicly traded companies had the highest probability of declaring bankruptcy. Like many of their American customers, these companies may be seeing less income coming in and debts that just won't shrink. On the list:

  • Hertz: financing a fleet of new models while consumers cut travel and spending.
  • Sprint Nextel: phone customers are fleeing for rival carriers with more popular "smart phone" models.
  • Macy's: customers are shying away from higher-end department stores in favor of more affordable shopping.
  • CBS: TV advertising dollars aren't what they used to be, and CBS's difficulty may be a sign that other broadcasters could lose their footing as well.

Whether or not any of these companies end up filing bankruptcy remains to be seen. Signs of economic recovery could find investors sighing with relief.

Corporate Bankruptcy Chapters

Like consumers, businesses typically have two options when filing bankruptcy: Chapter 7 bankruptcy and Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

Chapter 7 corporate bankruptcy works like chapter 7 personal bankruptcy, in which assets are sold, or liquidated, to repay creditors.

Chapter 11 bankruptcy is similar to chapter 13 for consumers, in which corporation enter a structured plan to repay creditors over time.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Monday, September 21st, 2009

U.S. Poverty Up, Income Down from 2007

In a press release early this month, the U.S. Census Bureau reported statistics on income, poverty and health insurance in the United States. For the most part, the numbers are not especially surprising, considering the current recession. Here’s what the Bureau reported.

Income Levels

Income levels were reported as decreasing year-over-year in all demographics. The breakdown of income change by race and ethnic origin in American households:

  • Non-Hispanic white households: Decline of 2.6%, to $55,530 (reported as statistically significant)
  • Black households: Decline of 2.8%, to $34,218 (reported as not statistically significant)
  • Asian households: Decline of 4.4%, to $65,637 (reported as not statistically significant)
  • Hispanic households: Decline of 5.6%, to $37,913 (reported as statistically significant)

The difference between men’s and women’s earnings has also changed since 2007: women who work full time, year-round in 2008 reportedly earned only 77% of what their male counterparts do, down from 78% in 2007.

Poverty Levels

For the first time since 2004, the poverty rate in the United States increased in 2008 at a statistically significant level. The poverty rate of 13.2 percent is apparently the highest in the country since 1997.

  • The family poverty rate in 2008 was 10.3% (up from 9.8% in 2007), with 8.1 million families living in poverty (up from 7.6 million).
  • The married-couple poverty rate increased to 5.5% (up from 4.9% a year before) and 3.3 million people (up from 2.8 million).
  • Racially and by ethnic origin, poverty levels increased in all demographics except blacks, for whom the poverty rate remained unchanged statistically.

Health Insurance Coverage

While the number of uninsured Americans rose from 2007 to 2008, the percentage of the total population without health coverage remained at 15.4%.

  • In 2008, 46.3 million Americans were without health insurance (up from 45.7 million in 2007).
  • 255.1 million Americans did have health insurance in 2008 (up from 253.4 million in 2007).
  • Private health coverage dipped in 2008 from 202.0 million to 201.0 million.
  • 87.4 million were covered by government health insurance, up from 83.0 million a year before.

The growing rate of uninsured and government-insured Americans is a major concern cited by proponents for health care reform, as well as the rate of Americans filing bankruptcy due to unmanageable health care costs.

Additional Resources

Income, Poverty and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2008 (PDF)

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Saturday, September 19th, 2009

Senate Votes to Withhold Funding for ACORN

ACORN, the Association of Community Organizers for Reform Now, has gotten a significant amount of negative publicity in the last week. Here’s a summary of what’s happening with the group, which describes itself as a group that helps those who have historically been locked out become powerful players in our democratic system.

Background: ACORN & the Federal Government

According to The New York Times, the federal government has provided ACORN with $53 million dollars since 1994. On September 14th, the Senate voted 83–7 to withhold further funds.

Further, the Census Bureau has reportedly informed ACORN that its help will not be needed with the 2010 census—a change from earlier plans.

Voter Registration in 2008

According to sources, ACORN came under fire from some conservatives during the election season last year, when as many as 30% of new voter registrations the group gathered were shown to be fraudulent.

The Latest: Undercover Videos

This week, James O’Keefe, a self-named activist filmmaker released undercover films he made of certain facilities. In the films:

  • O’Keefe poses as a pimp with a woman posing as a prostitute.
  • They visit ACORN offices for advice on getting a loan to open a brothel.
  • The ACORN workers apparently offer advice for how the pair can get around certain laws to get loans.

Though conservative infotainment network Fox News has treated the videos as a scandal, most mainstream networks have taken a less aggressive stance. In a statement, ACORN’s chief organizer, Bertha Lewis, asserts that the video-taping was attempted in various cities and failed for months before the results we’ve all recently seen were achieved.

Lewis also insists that the videos were doctored or edited to make their content seem more objectionable than it actually was. She notes, too, that the workers shown in the video have since been let go.

ACORN has a decades-long history of helping underprivileged groups achieve equality, including helping people get fair credit after filing bankruptcy and advocating changes to the bankruptcy law to help homeowners.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Thursday's news of the House of Representatives' decision to back President Obama's plan to end the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) has brought considerable tones to both sides of the political plate.

Democrats are in praise of the House bill, saying it represents a victory for students over the banks. Not surprisingly, most Republicans criticize the bill as a government takeover of an industry that has served students well.

But how will the passage of this bill and the resulting of the FFEL program dissolving affect those in the burdens and confines of bankruptcy?

The FFELP is the private sector student loan program that makes higher education affordable and accessible for millions of students and their families.

In today’s cumbersome financial climate more students than ever before are dependent on student loans to finance their education. According to SallieMae, roughly 78% of all student loans (were) provided under the FFELP, representing an estimated $64 billion in FY2009.

The Cost of Higher Education

What about those families who are struggling with bankruptcy and the financial burden of financing a college education? Will this place an even heavier burden on them?

There aren’t any benchmarks at this point to know, especially since this hasn’t been placed into a bill as it still sits within the Senate for approval. There is thought though that for those who are in the throes of bankruptcy this might offer a glimmer of hope to keep the two acts separate- bankruptcy and tuition.

Outlining this is the mere fact that by shifting towards a more universal financial aid lender, based in the federal government, then there will be less restrictive requirements for obtaining a loan.

If this were to happen then eligibility would be based more on the worthiness of the applicant as whole rather than of a credit score and history. In this it would also then put the responsibility of divvying up the offering to students by colleges a more balanced act.

Bankruptcy and Student Loans

Overall, there are two major points to consider if this bill passes the Senate. First being that filers for bankruptcy who are themselves applying for financial aid will not be able to discharge their student loans in the petition- unless they bring an action known as an Adversary Proceeding to the Bankruptcy Court. This would prove to the court that repaying the loans will create an undue hardship on themselves and their dependents.

Second and equally important is that one has nothing to do with the other; they are in fact mutually exclusive. The act of filing bankruptcy is one that is done in the spirit of reinvention, to give the petitioner a fresh start.

Adding to the mix the possibility that this person is either a college student needing financial aid or has a dependent who needs it has no bearing in the court process.

By taking the financial aid award out of the hands of our nation’s banking institutions and placing into the arms of our government- where many, many students already receive their loans ( via Perkins loans and others) - they are simply asserting a strategy to try and save close to $80 billion for our nation.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google