The recession has affected us all, but who's been hit the hardest?
Last year there were nearly 1.5 million bankruptcy filings--learn about the people behind those numbers. Check out our latest You Tube video and please share it with your friends.
The recession has affected us all, but who's been hit the hardest?
Last year there were nearly 1.5 million bankruptcy filings--learn about the people behind those numbers. Check out our latest You Tube video and please share it with your friends.
The Washington Post reported recently that the community organization ACORN (Association of Community Organizers for Reform Now) may be on the verge of filing for bankruptcy.
The group has, since its founding in 1970, devoted itself to helping low-income Americans find housing and to bringing voters from under-represented groups to the polls. Last fall, though, things took a turn for the worse for the group. Here’s what happened:
Though representatives of ACORN itself have apparently not made any public comment about bankruptcy plans, a glance at the events of the past few months leaves little doubt that such a step would not be entirely surprising.
Sources indicate that ACORN plans to continue dedicating itself to aiding and advocating for low-income Americans; however, they may do so under a new name and organization, both of which could be established during the bankruptcy process.
And if you’re worried about finding guidance through the home buying process, there’s no need to panic: the reorganization of ACORN leaves plenty of other groups and organizations available.
If you’re interested in becoming a homeowner but aren’t sure how to begin the process, visit the government’s Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) page for links to helpful resources and information on how to get moving toward your goal.
Why does the healthcare bill matter? Well, for starters, a 2009 Harvard study published in the American Journal of Medicine found that 60% of filers cited heath problems/medical bills as the main reason they filed bankruptcy.
The healthcare bill is now signed into law; but what does it mean for you?
We sifted through the press and propaganda to uncover how the new healthcare bill may affect you.
* Based upon House changes to the bill, which must still be approved by the Senate.
The Bill Aims to Cover 32 Million People.
That’s the combined populations of Alabama, Colorado, Illinois, New Mexico and Wisconsin, according to the Census Bureau.
Healthcare Spending = 16% of the U.S. Total GDP.
That’s $8,000 per person ($2.5 trillion), according to the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
In order to get enough votes to pass this bill last night, the House had to make certain changes to the bill and create a reconciliation bill. The Senate still has to vote on this reconciliation bill, so there may be some bill tweaking.
Stay tuned to Total Bankruptcy for more healthcare and medical bankruptcy news.
Tired of politicians and reporters telling you what’s best for you? Post a comment and share your thoughts.
Sources:
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development
The U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Population Projections
TheWhiteHouse.Gov: Health Reform by the Numbers.
Harvard Study: The American Journal of Medicine, August 2009 issue
BBC News: Obama Healthcare Reforms May Pay Off for Drug Firms, March 22, 2010
Reuters U.S. Edition: Factbox: Winners, losers in House Healthcare Bill, March 22, 2010
Associated Press: House Sends Health Care Overhaul Bill to Obama, March 22, 2010
CNN Health: How the Health Care Bill Could Affect You, March 22, 2010
The Christian Science Monitor: Health Care Reform Bill 101: What Does it Mean for Kids and Families? March 22, 2010.
With credit scores, student loans, mortgages, credit card debt, car loans, bank accounts, retirement funds and everything else you have to worry about to keep up with your finances, it’s no wonder if you feel overwhelmed from time to time.
Luckily, the General Services Administration’s Office of Citizen Services publishes a Consumer Handbook for American citizens every year – and, as a taxpaying consumer in the U.S., the book is absolutely free to you. Order your copy at http://www.consumeraction.gov.
If you don't have the time to sort through everything in the 172-page book, here’s a brief look at what this year’s handbook offers:
For more tips about securing your financial future, visit The Debtress blog.
The FTC has recently settled several cases relevant to consumer protection and financial stability. Here’s a summary of those cases and how they may impact you.
Not long ago, LifeLock ran a campaign offering comprehensive protection against identity theft for consumers. However, the FTC reports that 35 states’ Attorneys General challenged those claims, since the protection LifeLock offered was less than stellar.
In its ads, LifeLock claimed that it:
These services were offered for the price of $10 per month. Because these claims somewhat overstated the actual protection the company offered, many consumers lodged complaints and now LifeLock is prohibited from advertising services they can’t actually offer.
The company Roex, Inc. reportedly sold a range of products, including infrared saunas and dietary supplements, which they claimed would cure or alleviate symptoms of numerous serious diseases.
But the results didn't match the advertisements, and the FTC has ordered the company to make payments to past customers. The average amount of the refund check is $500.
Consumers who bought products from Roex, Inc. should be on the lookout for these checks, mailed March 5, 2010, and deposit or cash them – they are not a scam. The FTC notes that 5,700 checks were mailed, with a total value near $3 million.
An Illinois-based credit repair scammer has recently come to a cash settlement with the FTC for falsely indicating to consumers that it could remove negative entries on their credit reports, even if they were accurate and current, which violates federal laws. Some consumers who filed bankruptcy were targeted by the scam.
To avoid credit repair scams, keep in mind:
Debt collectors in certain areas of the country have begun contacting debtors in more and more harassing ways, according to a recent article from WNEP in Pennsylvania.
This situation is troublesome not only because it can cause fear and embarrassment for debt collectors’ victims, but also because such techniques are illegal.
While repeated phone calls from a bill collector may be irritating, some of the actions that are being attributed to collectors are downright appalling:
Clearly, something is wrong here. Debt collectors are not legally allowed to get away with such actions, but unfortunately many consumers aren’t aware that they have rights protected by federal law.
So what exactly are creditors forbidden from doing? Here’s a summary of what actions are prohibited by the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act:
The collectors mentioned in the story above were breaking the law—but unless the debtors are aware of the laws protecting them, they’re not likely to take any action.
If you’re facing aggressive behavior from a creditor, it may be time to consider working with a legal professional. One option for stopping creditor contacts is filing for bankruptcy, which will trigger an automatic stay that blocks all contact from creditors.
The hotel chain Extended Stay has been in the news lately, as its senior lenders and several financial firms attempt to pull it out of bankruptcy later in the year.
A $450 million injection of money into the company will, backers hope, be a sufficient component of a proposed plan to exit bankruptcy protection, the Wall Street Journal is reporting. Court papers in the bankruptcy case call on Paulson & Co. and Centerbridge Partners to provide the funds.
Paulson & Co. and Centerbridge Partners will invest $225 million into Extended Stay. This would represent a 22.5 percent stake in the struggling company. Additional money would come from a plan for Extended Stay to raise money via a rights offering. In this offering, the mortgage lenders that hold $4.1 billion in Extended Stay debt will have the chance, according to the Wall Street Journal, “to buy all the shares for an additional 22.5 percent stake plus warrants.”
These holders of Extended Stay mortgage debts will get new mortgage notes valued at $2.5 billion, and they will get a 55 percent stake in the company in the form of stock.
The details of this plan have come to light recently, following the investment agreements that Extended Stay made with the private firms.
Extended Stay filed for bankruptcy last June, following dropping occupancy in their hotels as a result of the difficult economy. The South Carolina-based company owns and maintains over 600 hotels, which are targeted at business travelers and mid-range hotel customers.
Two years ago, the Lightstone Group bought out the company from Blackstone Group LP for $8 billion. Under the new agreement, the entity that manages Extended Stay’s hotels will resign for these duties, in exchange for $30 million.
Following announcements of Extended Stay’s plan to get out of bankruptcy, a rival investor group made the announcement that its own plan would have been a better option than the one chosen.
Starwood Capital had been in the bidding to become the group investing the money in Extended Stay, though Paulson & Co. and Centerbridge Partners were chosen instead.
Now, the group is saying in court that it offered what it called a "binding offer" to sponsor the reorganization plan that Extended Stay will put in place. According to Starwood, it claims that its offer would provide "substantially greater" value to Extended Stay creditors, and that Extended Stay would have access to more cash than it will under the current plan.
Specific details of the Starwood offer were not filed in court. They did present their plan to object to Extended Stay’s current plan.
In January, Starwood claimed that it was being frozen out of the bid process. It said also that they were not getting the information that they needed to make a competitive bid, and that Centerbridge and Paulson were.
Starwood Capital led the restructuring and expansion of Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide back in the 1990s. They cited this experience in the hotel management business to support their claim to investment rights in court.
A case decided by the Supreme Court this week settles a question of attorneys' free speech rights raised by a Minnesota law firm concerned about restriction in the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA), according to the Washington Post.
Here are the pertinent details:
While the law firm’s concern with free speech may seem piddling here, in the context of bankruptcy cases, it has merit. In some cases, as the WSJ article points out, taking on certain kinds of debt immediately before a bankruptcy filing could benefit both the filer and his or her creditors.
For example, refinancing a troublesome mortgage to better allow a debtor to make payments could benefit all parties. The Supreme Court Justices reportedly acknowledged the truth of this and agreed that taking on more debt can, at times, be the wisest decision for a potential bankruptcy filer.
But, the court noted, the law can be read to mean that bankruptcy lawyers are restricted only from giving their clients advice that would lead to bankruptcy fraud.
Bankruptcy fraud is a serious matter – in fact, it can lead a court to throw out your case (and thus eliminate your chances at receiving a debt discharge) and earn you fines and jail time. This is one reason why working with a bankruptcy lawyer can be helpful.
Bankruptcy fraud includes:
A company that made bold promises about its ability to protect against identity theft has settled with the Federal Trade Commission after the validity of its claims was questioned.
LifeLock is a company that protects customers' identities from theft, and alerts customers about identity theft security breaches, according to the company's web site. LifeLock will even help consumers if their identity is stolen, by canceling and replacing stolen cards and verifying information changes.
According to federal regulators, however, LifeLock has made claims about its ability to protect customers from identity theft that it cannot uphold, leading to an agreement for the company to pay $12 million in settlements.
CNNMoney is reporting that the fine will settle charges that LifeLock made deceptive claims about its identity theft protection abilities. $11 million of the fine will go to the FTC, while another $1 million will go to a group of attorneys general from around the country. According to the FTC, this is one of the largest joint settlements between the FTC and the states.
According to the chairman of the FTC, Jon Liebowitz, LifeLock claimed that it could protect consumers against identity theft completely, including all types of identity theft.
The protection it actually provided,
said the chairman, left enough holes that you could drive a truck through it.
LifeLock advertises its services in a brash manner, by displaying the social security number of the company's CEO, Todd Davis, on the side of a truck that drives around in public, as well as on national television commercials. This show of confidence is meant to publicize their $10 per month services that they claim will keep users safe from identity theft.
The case that the FTC made against LifeLock was that the company made "deceptive claims" about its protection services. Among these claims were that LifeLock could guarantee protection against identity theft, and that, according to CNNMoney, "it was the first company to prevent identity theft from occurring."
There are certain types of identity theft that LifeLock claimed it could protect against, and the FTC argued that these fraud alerts did not actually protect against one of the most common types of identity theft: the misuse of existing accounts.
There was also the charge that LifeLock claimed, falsely, to be able to prevent changes to customers' address listings that weren't authorized, and that it constantly monitored customer credit report activity.
The FTC also said that LifeLock made untrue statements about data security, claiming that sensitive data was only accessed on a "need-to-know" basis. According to the FTC, however, LifeLock collected social security numbers and credit card numbers on a routine basis.
Davis, the CEO of LifeLock, said of the settlement that he was pleased with it, and that it would help to establish the advertising standards for the identity theft protection industry. He went on to say that the activities in the FTC charges were from several years ago, and that LifeLock agreed to settle the case as a way to put the issues behind them.
We agreed to settle this matter,
he said, in order to quickly put this behind us so we can get back to doing what we do best—helping to protect our members from identity theft.
The future of LifeLock remains uncertain, with some analysts saying that bankruptcy may be its ultimate fate.
Tags: bankruptcy, bankruptcy demographics, filing bankruptcy
Posted in Year in Bankruptcy | 2 Comments »