Archive for June, 2011

The Wall Street Journal reported this week on a man whose bankruptcy case has outlived him. And he’s not too sympathetic a character: after defrauding clients of his business out of $19 billion, the man was reportedly put into federal prison.

Sources indicate that the fraudster, Barry Stokes, died in a hospital there before his bankruptcy trustee had been able to work through his case. As of now, reports note that:

  • Hidden assets are still missing: This unsavory fellow apparently owned a lot of (somewhat) valuable art but hid it before his death. Most was found, but the trustee is still hunting some of it down. The proceeds from a sale of the art would go to his creditors.
  • Liquidation won’t help much: Unfortunately, even though some pieces of the art could be worth upwards of $25,000, the money won’t do much for his debts of more than $30 million.

Fraudster Used Clients’ Retirement Funds to Buy Art

The details of this particular bankruptcy case are heartbreaking. Too often, individuals struggling with debt dip into their retirement accounts in an effort to stave off creditors and avoid filing for bankruptcy. And in many cases, people like this end up in bankruptcy anyway, without any nest egg for their retirement.

In this case, Stokes ran a business that managed people’s retirement funds and skimmed whatever he wanted from those funds for personal purchases. Now, his clients are his creditors in bankruptcy and have filed claims for more than $30 million.

The worst part? Because Stokes reportedly didn’t have much in the way of valuable assets, these people will likely not see much of their retirement money again!

Bankruptcy & Retirement Funds

For the record, retirement funds have a special place in bankruptcy:

  • Exempt from creditors: Whether you file for Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy, the bankruptcy court typically will not go after your retirement funds during a bankruptcy case. The idea is that these funds will keep you financially sound in the future and so it’s in everyone’s best interest to leave them alone.
  • Heavily taxed: What’s worse, people who withdraw retirement funds early face serious tax penalties. That means they don’t get the full benefit of the funds either in the present or the future!
  • Irreplaceable: Most of us accumulate money for retirement gradually, over several decades. Using that money for debts can seriously damage your long-term financial health because it’s close to impossible to replenish the supply.

The bottom line about retirement funds: they’re safe in bankruptcy. If your nest egg is the only thing between you and the bankruptcy court, you might want to keep it safe and talk to a bankruptcy attorney about filing a petition.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

We’ve all heard stories about lottery winners ending up in bankruptcy court, so it’s interesting to hear a twist on the usual saga. According to Time magazine, Patricia Kluge (once called "the richest divorcée in history") has filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy.

This, after her 1990 divorce left her with a reported $1 billion settlement. Astonishing as it is, it teaches some important lessons about money, debt and bankruptcy.

Why the Very Rich Go Bankrupt

It’s easy to imagine that if we won the lottery, all our money problems would go away. But as Ms. Kluge shows us, it’s not about how much money you have, it’s about how you manage it. This lesson is valuable whether we’re billionaires or recent bankruptcy filers.

So how can you make sure you’re managing your money well?

  • Know what you make: Seriously. Look at your income and know exactly how many dollars flow into your bank account each month.
  • Know what you spend: With digital banking and tracking tools, this is easier than ever. But a surprising number of people don’t bother keeping track of where their money goes. Until you actually figure out how you’re spending your money, you won’t be able to make meaningful financial decisions.
  • Make a plan: Some people would call this a “budget.” But lots of us don’t like that word. So instead, plan where you want your money to go. Plan for some to go to savings, some to go to bills, and some to go to treats.
  • Look ahead: We’re often blindsided by expenses that we “didn’t see coming.” But if you haven’t taken your car in for a checkup in years (or haven’t seen the dentist in ages), you’re playing a risky game. Small maintenance costs are usually cheaper than major repairs or replacements, so keep track of the state of your health and appliances.
  • Look behind: One way to plan for future emergencies is to review your expenses of the last few months and years. First kid needed braces? Better start saving for the second. Air conditioning on the fritz? Put some money away for next summer. It’s natural to ignore problems we don’t want to deal with, but that can lead to long-term turmoil in your finances.

Most of us won’t have the chance to squander a billion dollars, but anyone who files for bankruptcy is eligible for a shiny new financial start at the end of the case. It’s important for all of us to remember that bankruptcy is the beginning of a process – careful financial management in the post-bankruptcy period can make the difference between financial floundering and financial success.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

Wednesday, June 22nd, 2011

Bankruptcy Court Challenges DOMA

The Defense of Marriage Act, which bars federally recognized same-sex marriage, got a surprise challenge from a California bankruptcy court last week. Here’s a look at what happened and what it might mean in the future.

  • A gay couple married in California. In 2008, when gay marriage was briefly legalized in the Golden State, Gene Balas and Carlos Morales wed.
  • Later that year, Proposition 8 was passed. This law amended California’s constitution to exclude the right for gay couples to marry, though the state acknowledged the legitimacy of marriages that had already occurred.
  • The couple filed jointly for Chapter 13 bankruptcy protection. In February 2011, the couple was pushed by illness and unemployment to seek bankruptcy protection. They filed under Chapter 13, which allows filers to catch up on past debts with the help of a three- to five-year repayment plan.
  • The U.S. Trustee’s office requested dismissal of the case. Because bankruptcy is governed by federal laws and the federal government does not recognize same-sex marriages, the U.S. Trustee wanted the California court to deny the joint bankruptcy protection. If this request had been granted, the two men would have had to file for bankruptcy individually. This could have been more expensive, both in initial filing fees and long-term debt repayment.
  • The California judges refused dismissal. Instead of tossing the case out, twenty judges signed a ruling asserting that DOMA is unconstitutional and infringed the rights of the two men seeking bankruptcy protection.

Joint Bankruptcy, DOMA & Civil Rights

Right now, married couples seeking bankruptcy protection can choose between filing individually or jointly. The decision usually depends on state laws, the types of debts a couple has, a couple’s income and a number of other factors.

But because DOMA only permits marriage to a certain group of citizens, it automatically excludes others from joint bankruptcy protection. This exclusion, say California bankruptcy judges, is not in line with the rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

The judges used the language of the DOMA law to dispute its validity:

  • The joint Chapter 13 bankruptcy, noted the judges, would have “no effect on procreation.” One of DOMA’s professed goals is to promote childbearing.
  • The bankruptcy case, too, would be in no danger of “harm[ing] any marriage of heterosexual persons,” according to the California ruling. Another of DOMA’s stated goals was to defend and nurture the tradition of heterosexual marriage.

The case is getting a lot of attention because it attacks the controversial anti-gay marriage law from an unexpected angle. It also comes only months after the Obama administration announced that it would no longer defend DOMA in court, as it deemed the law unconstitutional.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

Monday, June 20th, 2011

Sympathy for Debt Collectors?

Anyone who’s been harassed by debt collectors during tough financial times may have a hard time swallowing the latest request from the debt collection industry: give them a break. But the collection industry’s trade association has a fair point to make about its workers – they’re not all bad.

And, as happens too often, the bad apples in the group have given the whole industry a rotten reputation. Consider this troublesome info (reported in the New York Times):

  • Many debt collectors have to use fake names when they work because clients frequently threaten them. An alias protects them from anyone who might actually take action.
  • Most debt collectors have stories of being shouted at, called names and belittled while on the job.
  • In many cases, debt collectors are, in fact, trying to get money that we consumers agreed to pay.

New Consumer Protection on the Horizon?

Right now, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act outlines what debt collectors can and cannot do. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regulates the industry, but has little power to punish offenders or tighten rules.

That could change starting this July, though. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau will start actively playing the role outlined for it in 2010’s consumer protection law. Part of that role is regulating the debt collection industry, which has some debt collection workers worried.

Activists on both sides of the issue have highlighted problems with the 1977 FDCPA:

  • Since its passage, it hasn’t changed much to acknowledge new technologies like mobile devices or email.
  • The fine for violations has stayed constant at $1,000, which today doesn’t significantly deter debt collectors.
  • Many debt collectors are two or three times removed from the original creditor, which can frustrate and confuse consumers.

What to Do When The Debt Collector Calls You

It’s important to understand your rights and responsibilities as a consumer. Certain debts (like those discharged in bankruptcy and those whose statute of limitations has expired) cannot legally be collected. Other debts are the debtor’s responsibility to pay.

One debt collector interview in the Times commented that it was much easier to work with consumers than to yell at them. In many cases, admitting you don’t have the money to pay a debt can save everyone a lot of hassle. Once you’ve determined the facts, a debt collector might be able (and willing) to work toward an alternate payment schedule or some other debt modification.

And people who are really in over their heads financially may want to start making phone calls themselves – to a bankruptcy lawyer.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

You’ve probably heard of the crime known as identity theft, in which a criminal uses someone’s sensitive information (like Social Security Number, credit card number, or bank account information) to make fraudulent financial transactions.

But have you heard about the newest version of this nefarious crime? It’s called taxpayer identity theft and, according to the Government Accountability Office (GAO), it’s become five times more common in the last two years. It works like this:

  • The identity theft uses someone else’s SSN to get a job: People may do this for a variety of reasons, including criminal records or illegal residential status. Regardless, it can wreak havoc on the victim’s life and finances.
  • The identity thief files his taxes early: Most legitimate taxpayers tend to wait until later in the season to file, so getting the paperwork in early increases a thief’s chances of going undetected.
  • The victim files his tax return: When the victim of taxpayer identity theft submits his forms to the IRS, he finds out his forms have “already” been submitted. That is, forms with his information have been submitted by someone else.
  • The victim has to sort everything out: According to sources, this can mean hours of phone calls to government agencies, credit card issuers and banks in an effort to clear up the confusion. In many cases, victims have to wait up to six months to get any tax returns owed them.
  • The IRS distributes an official form: To help the victim with future confusion the identity theft is likely to cause, the IRS offers victims an official document (the 14039 form, or the IRS Identity Theft Affidavit).

Protecting Yourself from Identity Theft

As identity theft victims know, sorting through the mess left by an identity thief is not for the faint of heart. Identity theft can cause:

  • Credit score damages: Identity thieves can open new credit accounts, max out existing cards, drain bank accounts and more, depending on what information they get. All these can hurt a credit score. (Note: credit reporting bureaus will remove such information, but it takes a lot of legwork on the victim’s part.)
  • Bankruptcy: Even though there are protections in place to prevent identity theft from leading to bankruptcy, many filers indicate that a stolen identity was one factor that led them to file.
  • Criminal troubles: Depending on what kinds of actions an identity thief engages in, a victim can be mistakenly apprehended by law enforcement agencies. Like most identity theft consequences, this can generally be cleared up, but not without effort on the victim’s part.

The bottom line? Identity thieves are constantly thinking of new ways to get their hands on sensitive information. Be careful with yours.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

Monday, June 13th, 2011

Inherited Money in Bankruptcy

One question that many potential bankruptcy filers have is how the bankruptcy court handles inherited money and money that bankruptcy filers expect to receive in the months after their filing. The answer depends on a few variables. Here’s a look at some of them.

  • The 180-day rule. One of the most important rules about bankruptcy and inheritance is that funds inherited within 180 days (or about six months) of the filing of a bankruptcy petition are generally considered to be part of the bankruptcy estate. This means that the bankruptcy court has the right to use those funds to repay creditors, pay court fees or do anything else it deems appropriate.
  • Date of death. In the case of money inherited from a deceased person’s estate, the date of death will be taken into consideration. If the person died within the 180-day window, then the funds generally go to the bankruptcy estate, even if the filer doesn’t receive them until some time later.
  • Type of inheritance. Another factor bankruptcy courts consider is how a person inherited money. Depending on laws in your state, the court might treat an actual will differently than another type of contract designating you as heir to certain money or property. A bankruptcy lawyer in your state can help you figure out how the court is likely to treat your expected inheritance.
  • Exemptions. In some states, inherited property might be protected by bankruptcy exemptions. In certain cases, even if an inheritance falls within 180 days of a bankruptcy filing, the filer may be able to keep the inherited property.
  • Bankruptcy fraud. It’s important to note that filers must report any expected inheritance on their bankruptcy petitions. If a filer tries to lie about or conceal inherited assets, the court could convict him of bankruptcy fraud, which is punishable by a serious fine and up to five years in jail.

Inherited Money & Debts

If you have reason to expect that you will inherit money or assets in the near future, it’s a good idea to start thinking now about how you plan to use that money. While debt repayment is one option, it’s not the only one.

Consider speaking with a financial adviser about your options for setting up an emergency fund, negotiating your debts, and taking money management or investment classes. If you have debt, taking advantage of an influx of cash to improve your overall financial system may be more effective than simply making a one-time debt repayment.

Alternately, if you’re expecting an inheritance and wondering whether or not filing bankruptcy makes sense for you (either now or later), you may want to seek the counsel of a bankruptcy attorney.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

Wednesday, June 8th, 2011

How to Avoid Money-Guzzling Scams

One of the most troubling aspects of financial scams is that they prey on people’s best intentions. Nearly every time a natural disaster occurs, the Federal Trade Commission issues a report warning against scammers posing as charity fundraisers offering their funds to the latest victims.

And being victimized by a scam can cost a lot of money, cause serious damage to your credit score and take hours and hours of your time to recover from. Here’s a look at some steps you can take to make sure you and your finances are protected from scam artists.

Protect Your Money

  • Do some research. If you’re offered a questionable deal over the phone or in person, don’t agree right away. Instead, consult with a trusted friend or family member. That way, you’ll have a chance to cool down and get a second opinion.
  • Check your credit. Anyone who has filed for bankruptcy understands the importance of monitoring her credit report, and in addition to giving you a general picture of your financial health, it can show you whether or not anyone besides you has been using your accounts or identifying information. You can see your credit report for free at AnnualCreditReport.com to make sure you’re the only one spending your money.
  • Keep your information private. Most people know now not to write their Social Security Number on checks, but it’s also a good idea to take greater measures to protect yourself. Check out the FTC’s resources for keeping your phone number, email address and other contact information private.
  • Know debit and credit card risks. While most credit card issuers offer excellent protections for scam victims, debit card protections are often scant. If you have the option between debit and credit (and you can trust yourself to pay your bill in full each month), choose credit when making large purchases or ordering products online.
  • Know the risks of email and phone calls. These days, scammers can call themselves whatever they want to trick caller ID into making you think you’re talking with someone trustworthy. And email scammers are getting better and better at sending phony links that look legitimate. Generally speaking, don’t offer personal information unless you’ve typed a URL or dialed a phone number yourself; otherwise, you risk sharing your sensitive facts with the wrong sort of people.
  • Pay attention to your medical information. When you receive mail from your health care provider about services or insurance issues, read through it carefully to make sure nobody but you has been using your information to receive medical treatment. Medical identity theft is a serious concern that can damage you financially and lead to inappropriate medical treatment.
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

Monday, June 6th, 2011

Housing Prices Hit Eight-Year Low

The latest figures from Standard & Poor’s Case-Schiller Index show that the double-dip in the housing market many economists feared is now a reality. In other words, according to sources, housing market prices have taken another nosedive and home values are now near the same level they were in mid-2002.

How much of a dip is this second downward spike? Reports indicate that:

  • The first quarter of 2011 saw a 4.2 percent decline in home prices.
  • In the final quarter of 2010, prices dropped 3.6 percent.
  • Home prices are currently 5.1 percent lower than they were this time last year and, according to Standard & Poor’s, have reached a new low even for the recession.

If all this sounds like bad news, the kicker is that the cycle of foreclosures and lowered home values seems unlikely to end any time soon.

Gloomy Outlook for the Housing Market

Consider these troublesome figures.

  • About 1.9 million homes in the U.S. are currently in some stage of foreclosure, according to RealtyTrac, a company that keeps track of such things.
  • Housing prices fall when supply is greater than demand (that is, when there are more homes available than people looking to buy).
  • Right now, supply is skyrocketing: empty foreclosure properties are common sights in many states, and apparently nearly two million more are about to follow.
  • Unfortunately, demand is also fairly low: many Americans are still skittish about their employment situation and unwilling to take on the burden of a mortgage. Further, many banks have tightened lending standards, making mortgage loans harder to come by even for those interested in buying.
  • On top of all this, sources note that as many as 28 percent of U.S. homes are currently underwater, meaning that the owner owes more on the mortgage than the home’s current value. Underwater homeowners may find themselves in foreclosure down the line, whether by strategically defaulting or by being unable to make payments.

Can Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Help?

In the past, Chapter 13 bankruptcy has often been heralded as a way to stave off or prevent foreclosure for some filers. The question of whether Chapter 13 could help some of the millions of Americans who might have mortgage foreclosure in their future is a complex one.

Chapter 13 may work for some people facing foreclosure, but only if those people have sufficient income to make regular payments according to the repayment plan. In other words, if you’re in danger of losing your home because you lost your job, Chapter 13 may not do the trick.

One interesting note, though, is that some sources have reported bankruptcy judges ruling for mortgage cram-downs in Chapter 13 cases, despite laws that prohibit such rulings.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

Friday, June 3rd, 2011

How Bankruptcy Saved Detroit

Presidential hopeful Mitt Romney says that the reason America's Big Three automakers have bounced back since the recession is due to bankruptcy, not bailouts.

In an interview Friday with the CBS Early Show, Romney repeated the stance he took in a 2008 op-ed piece in the New York Times at the height of the bailout talks - that filing bankruptcy is a responsible step to take when faced with financial hardship.

"The right process for an enterprise in trouble is not to be given free money from the taxpayers with a bailout, but instead go through a bankruptcy process, reorganize debts, and reduce costs and come out stronger," Romney told CBS's Erica Hill Friday.

Of the three major Detroit automakers, General Motors and Chrysler both filed Chapter 11 bankruptcies in 2009. Both also received bailouts from the U.S. Government, funded by tax payers. Only Ford survived the recession without turning to bankruptcy or receiving a bailout, and instead secured a line of credit to help them bridge the recession's gap in sales.

So how did bankruptcy help Detroit? While bankruptcy can be complex, especially for corporations, it offers a very clear benefit: a reorganization of debts into a more affordable plan. In the case of a Chapter 11, business can also renegotiate contracts, sell off unnecessary assets, receive some debt forgiveness, and reorganize as a new business entity. This is typically favored over Chapter 7 bankruptcy, as it allows the business to stay in operation during and after the bankruptcy.

Bankruptcy allowed GM and Chrysler to shed off the obligations that were keeping them from being truly innovative, and reorganize as a new entity that could focus on a successful future, Romney argues. And while the two automakers did receive bailout funds, having gone through bankruptcy first left them in a better position to capitalize on the investment by taxpayers. Both GM and Chrysler have repaid significant portions of the bailouts.

Romney also takes credit for the situation, saying that his 2008 New York Times piece convinced Obama to hold off on an immediate bailout.

"So I'm very proud of the fact that, in fact, we called it like it was, and that is these companies needed to go through a bankruptcy process, come out through bankruptcy, go back to work, get jobs for the people who had would otherwise have lost jobs if these companies just trailed on down," he told CBS.

"And by the way, we could have saved billions of dollars had we moved to bankruptcy from the very beginning."

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

Wednesday, June 1st, 2011

The Harsh Reality of Car Title Loans

Legislators and consumer advocates have taken stands in recent years against payday loans, largely considered one of the most nefarious financial traps available to low-income consumers. But more recently, some worried analysts have taken up the torch of another type of absurdly high-cost loan: car title loans.

According to a recent post at CreditSlips, this type of loan can wreak serious financial havoc on consumers who can least afford to lose money. Here’s a look at some of the troubling numbers.

How Title Loans Work

Car title loans work like this:

  • A borrower enters the lender’s storefront in need of cash.
  • The lender originates a secured loan with the borrower’s vehicle as collateral. (According to sources, lenders will typically offer dollar amounts of no more than 40 percent of a vehicle’s value.)
  • Interest rates on car title loans can reportedly top 300 percent, meaning that most borrowers end up paying far more than their car’s value in interest payments over the repayment period.
  • If a borrower cannot afford to make payments, the lender has the legal right to repossess the vehicle used to secure the loan.
  • Some lenders, it seems, also sell used cars (no doubt those repossessed from customers unable to pay).

The Hidden Dangers of Car Title Loans

As most people can see, the risk of losing your car to a car title lender is pretty high, especially given the astronomical interest rates charged and the typically limited financial means of most title loan borrowers.

But, according to a recent study, the actual cost to title loan borrowers seems to be higher than expected. Sources note that:

  • At some auto title lenders, the repossession rate stands at 13.1 percent of loans - that means 1 in 8 people who go in for a loan end up getting their vehicle repossessed by the lender.
  • The typical auto title borrowers will take out between 3 and five loans from a given title lender. This means that most borrowers apparently return more than once to take on high-interest, high-risk loans.

Know Your Options

While car title loans may seem like the only way out of a tight financial spot, it’s important to understand the high risks associated with them. If you’re struggling with serious debt (or know someone who is), consider seeking the help of a bankruptcy lawyer or credit counselor for guidance.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!