Posts Tagged ‘predatory lending’

Wednesday, November 10th, 2010

A Better Alternative to Payday Loans?

The financial dangers of taking on a payday loan (a short-term, high-interest loan offered to people with weak financial histories) generally outweigh any benefits. For cash-strapped Americans who need to make rent or utility payments, though, payday loans are often the only viable source of cash.

But, according to a post on WiseBread, that might change soon: it seems that, in some parts of the country, a more consumer friendly alternative to payday loans is cropping up.

More Affordable Small Loans

Here’s a look at what might soon act as a better option for people looking to borrow a little money for a short amount of time.

  • FDIC pilot program: Between February 2008 and February 2010, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation tested a program that allowed Americans to borrow up to $2,500 for a period greater than 90 days. Interest rates were capped at 36 percent (but were often less).
  • Non-payment loan requirements: In addition to making regular payments on their loans, borrowers were often required to meet other criteria, such as opening and putting money into a savings account, taking a financial literacy class and more. These measures were instituted to reduce or eliminate a borrower’s need for small dollar amount loans in the future.

According to the FDIC’s web site, the experiment showed promising results in many of the volunteer test banks (28 across the country). Now, the question many consumer advocates are asking is when will such programs be more widely available.

Finding Affordable Loans Near You

If you’re in need of a loan but don’t have the credit score or history to qualify for a traditional bank loan, you may be able to find a small dollar amount lender near you that won’t charge punishing interest rates. Here’s what to look for:

  • Check out your local banks: Sources note that national banks like Bank of America and Wells Fargo have not yet hopped on the small loan bandwagon, but various regional banks across the country do offer a variety of small loans. To find out what your options are, call some local banks and ask about their non-traditional lending programs.
  • Visit a credit union: If no banks in your area offer smaller loans, check out some of the credit unions. Because they’re structured on a more community-centric model, credit unions may have more alternatives for local members without other options.

It’s uncertain right now whether these programs will catch on (and even whether they’ll get some sort of national support to help them grow), but it seems that the FDIC’s chair, Sheila Blair, hopes they do.

Monday, November 1st, 2010

What New Debt Settlement Rules Mean for You

The Federal Trade Commission issued new rules governing how debt settlement firms can charge consumers for their services. The new rules prohibit debt settlement firms from charging upfront fees for their services, which in theory will prevent some of the predatory practices that cost consumers so much money in the past.

Here’s a summary of some of the potential side effects these new rules might have on the debt settlement process.

Fewer Ads, More Honest Claims

  • A drop-off in ads claiming to settle debts for little money: A ban on hefty upfront fees will mean that simply bringing customers through the door will no longer guarantee income for debt settlement firms, which in turn will mean that dropping money on TV and radio commercials may no longer be worthwhile financially.
  • More selective consumer selection: Now that debt settlement firms cannot charge every customer large fees, they’ll have to more carefully choose which customers they agree to help. This will likely be good news, regardless of your goals. If you’re a good candidate for debt settlement, visiting a debt settlement firm may have a greater chance of helping you than in the past. And if you’re not a good candidate, the debt settlers may be less likely to waste your time and money with their services.
  • Claims made based on all customers: Before the FTC’s rules took effect, debt settlement firms commonly made claims based only on the settlement experiences of their most successful customers. Now, though, companies must advertise using figures that represent all their customers’ experiences, meaning that the figures should more honestly represent what the company may be able to do for you.
  • Some closures of debt settlement firms: Some debt settlement firms may no longer have a workable business model without upfront fees from customers, which could mean closures in debt settlement firms.
  • “Innovative” trickery: And, finally, as with any implementation of new rules, some debt settlers may try to find ways around the new requirements. As always, you are still responsible for making sure your money and financial health is in good hands.

Debt Settlement without a Firm

If you’re struggling with debt and are trying to figure out which debt-relief option might work best for you (bankruptcy, debt settlement, credit counseling, etc.), remember that you can contact your creditors without any help from a third party. By exploring all of these options, you may find the debt-relief option that works best for you.

Wednesday, September 8th, 2010

FTC Deals with Payday Lending Scammers

The Federal Trade Commission has announced that it has reached a settlement deal with a payday loan company that was illegally garnishing the wages of some of its borrowers. Here are the basic facts of the case and some pointers to keep you from getting burned:

  • The company offered payday loans. The companies known as GeteCash and LoanPointe reportedly offered consumers payday loans, a type of short-term, high-interest loan considered by many financial analysts to be “predatory.”
  • Consumers agreed to online terms and conditions. In order to apply for a loan online, consumers apparently had to check an agreement of terms box. One of these terms, it seems, indicated that the company could garnish a borrower’s wages (that is, take money from their paycheck) if she failed to make loan payments.
  • The garnishment was illegal. According to the FTC’s charges, the payday lending company overreached its legal debt-collection abilities. While laws permit federal agencies to garnish the wages of someone who owes the government money, non-government groups aren’t afforded the same privilege.

The FTC apparently took action because the payday lenders not only indicated that they had the same collection rights as the government, but also claimed that their customers knew that they had agreed to the garnishment clause.

Because of the FTC’s actions, those behind the garnishment scam are barred from certain lending practices and responsible for a $38,133 judgment that has been suspended because of their current financial situation.

Don’t Get Burned by Payday Lenders

In recent years, legislators have taken action against the payday lending industry, which can lead struggling consumers into a perilous cycle of debt. Many financial insiders recommend avoiding payday lenders at all costs because of their high cost. Here are some options you might consider before turning to a payday lender if you’re in need of cash:

  • Friends and family: Asking to borrow money from a loved one may be hard, so consider this twist: offer to do chores or run errands in exchange for some money. Or, if you’re already swamped, volunteer to write up a formal payment agreement outlining the terms of repayment.
  • Your boss: If you have a decent relationship with your boss, consider asking for extra work and/or an advance on pay. This may not work more than once, but if you’re in a serious pinch, an advance on wages will likely hurt your finances less than a payday loan.
  • Your credit card: If you aren’t maxed out on your plastic, using it to pay is generally less expensive than taking out a payday loan. Credit cards generally have lower interest rates than payday lenders and offer you more options for paying them back.

If you’ve already turned to payday lenders to keep up with financial obligations, you may want to consider the financial relief that filing for bankruptcy could offer you.

Monday, August 30th, 2010

How to Steer Clear of Car Loan Scams

As consumers continue to struggle under the weight of a lagging economy, many Americans are trying to refinance their car loans.

Unfortunately, scammers have taken notice and are increasingly trying to bilk people of their hard earned cash. According to Rosemary Shahan, the president of Consumers for Auto Reliability and Safety, car loan scams are a “problem just about everywhere.”

Shahan recognizes that many people are able to refinance their car loans, but warns that “the way to do it isn’t to go to these companies who are out there advertising, ‘We can miraculously get you out of this excruciatingly bad deal.”

A recent article from MarketWatch provides some tips aimed at helping you avoid car loan scams:

  • Choose wisely: If you want to refinance your loan, don’t opt for a group that heavily advertises its miraculous refinancing abilities. Instead, choose a safer organization, like a credit union or nonprofits like the Consumer Federation of America, or the National Foundation for Credit Counseling.
  • Speak with your lender: Since no lender wants to go unpaid, they are often willing to work with you to adjust your payment plan. According to the Better Business Bureau, lenders will often assist you by stretching your payments over a longer period of time.
  • Get it on paper: If a loan reduction company offers you any promises, make sure to get them in writing. Other things to get in writing include the services they will provide, the costs of those services, and promised money-back guarantees.
  • Do your homework: Your local Better Business Bureau likely offers reports that reveal how many complaints have been filed against a particular lender and whether that company has been the subject of any lawsuits.
  • Shy away from up-front fees: If a company demands that you pay large fees before they provide any services, they may be violating state law. Many states have outlawed this kind of behavior. Even if up-front fees are legal in your state, the practice could still be a scam.

An Alternative to Refinancing

If you cannot make your car payments, but are reluctant to adjust the terms of your loan, there are alternative steps you can take to ease your financial pain.

One helpful alternative may be to simply sell your car. Sources indicate that use-car prices are pretty high right now since last year’s cash-for-clunkers program removed a lot of used cars from the market.

So, you may be able to sell your current car and purchase a cheaper one with more reasonable payment terms.

If, however, your car loan is the least of your financial problems, and you need someone to talk to about your struggles, consider calling a personal bankruptcy lawyer.

Despite sweeping financial reforms passed by Congress a few weeks ago, there remain loopholes in the new laws that spell continued danger for consumers. Specifically, the new laws still allow some predatory lenders to roam free.

While the reforms put lending restrictions on most major financial institutions, car dealers and community banks escaped the grasp of the new federal regulations. This oversight poses a serious threat to many consumers, as these two industries are annually involved in billions of dollars in loans to tens of millions of people.

Car Dealers

Most folks don’t pay for automobiles with cash. As a result, auto dealers are seasoned veterans of the loan industry. With high stakes in the financial reform package, sources indicate that the auto industry lobbied hard to escape the regulations. Some of their key gains include:

  • We Didn’t Do it: One of the most criticized loopholes of the financial reform bill was the “carve out” won by auto dealers. Car dealers escaped further regulation because they convinced legislators that they were not responsible for the recent economic meltdown.
  • Power in Numbers: How do car dealers have so much lobbying muscle? Mostly because there are more than 18,000 dealers nationwide. And the financial institutions who aid in most car loans were glad to assist their friends in the car industry, as well.
  • More Escapees: In addition to the exemption for car dealers, companies who sell boats, motorcycles, and RVs are also not governed by the new legislation.

Finally, while 90 percent of car loans are financed through standard financial institutions, like banks, car dealers serve as brokers about 80 percent of the time. So, according to consumer groups, the car dealer’s role as a broker leaves room for them to push loans with unfairly high interest rates. According to some reports, car dealers are more likely to charge excessively high interest rates to minorities and lower-income borrowers.

Community Banks

In order to avoid further regulation, community banks successfully argued that they are much different entities than larger financial institutions. Typically, small community banks charge smaller fees than their larger counterparts and are more dependent on aid of small, local businesses.

As a result of lobbying efforts, community banks are now exempt from paying the same Federal Deposit Insurance premiums as large banks. In addition, all banks with assets under $10 billion are not required to follow new lending regulations.

Still, the Independent Community Banks of America recognize the potential for loan scams, and they warn that consumers should always be wary of loans that sound too good to be true. If you are unsure of whether or not you’re the victim of a financial scam, don’t hesitate to contact a bankruptcy attorney.

Thursday, June 10th, 2010

The Student Debt Debate: Who’s to Blame?

Student loans provide people chances for their education, dreams and future career opportunities. But what happens when it’s time face the hefty debt waiting after graduation?

Who is to blame if the recent grad gets overwhelmed with debt and can't afford to pay their loans back?

A recent New York Times article profiled one indebted grad and tried to address all the parties involved.

For students like Courtney Munna, blame is no longer her concern. Now she regrets taking out $100,000 in student loans to attend N.Y.U. and wishes she made better financial decisions regarding the loans.

Since graduation in 2005, Munna has deferred her loans as a short term solution to scrape by and pay the rest of her bills.

But the question still remains, who’s to blame for students like Munna getting in over their heads.

The article said that both the students and their families have personal responsibilities to know their finances and take out loans they can afford to pay back.

The article also placed some responsibility on the universities since they have access to student’s finances after they fill out the financial aid forms, and are in a familiar situation helping students find aid. Students, on the other hand, are often overly trusting of universities to look out for their best interest.

The Times suggests that these schools should advise prospective students they cannot afford their school, an idea that Vice President of Enrollment at N.Y.U. Randall Deike said “would be completely inappropriate.” Besides discrimination issues, it’s not the schools decision to make whether or not a student can afford their school.

Their business is to enlist students, not turn them away. Deike agreed that prospective students should not take on too much debt, but he said that’s their decision.

There are other reasons universities do not want to tell students to search for a cheaper education. They said it might reflect poorly on their school and suggest that their education might not provide opportunities after graduation.

The lenders themselves have continued to take the blame for loaning too much money with too lax of standards. In Munna’s case she was approved for $40,000 in loans by Citibank, even after she was already deep in debt.

As of now, Munna makes $22 an hour and barely makes the bills. She knows she’s responsible for taking out to much money in loans. But said she doesn’t “want to spend the rest of her life slaving away to pay for an education…[she] would happily give back.”

Student loans typically take decades to repay, even if the student is fortunate to find a well-paying job after graduating. Many students see a series of forbearance and deferrals while they wait to land the right job, as interest and fees pile onto their original loans.

And there is typically no way to eliminate student loans other than to pay them in full. Currently, student loans are one of the rare types of debt that cannot be discharged in bankruptcy.

Wednesday, July 29th, 2009

How to Not Get Bamboozled by Banks

Even though lenders are no longer throwing themselves at consumers and credit is a bit tighter than it was a couple years ago, I think it’s worthwhile to refresh everyone’s memory on warning signs of predatory lending.

Here's what to look out for when you're heading to purchase big-ticket items like cars, appliances and houses:

Warning #1: Excessive Fees

Excessive fees can be disguised in a variety of ways, depending on what type of loan you’re seeking:

  • Credit cards: Account activation fees, membership fees, service charges, limit-extending fees, yearly fees – if your bill or credit card agreement is littered with similar costs, beware. This is a classic sign of predatory lending. In some cases, the fees charged greatly outstrip the cost of a given service.
  • Home loans: While some points and fees are standard procedure for home loans, exceeding the norm in such charges is considered predatory. To determine whether your lender is charging excessive fees, research typical fees in your area and take a look at your credit report or score (www.annualcreditreport.com).

Warning #2: Prepayment Penalties

These are most common with mortgages, particularly subprime mortgages .

Generally, if you’re charged a penalty of some kind for repaying part of your loan before its due date, the loan is usually considered to be predatory.

Such penalties prevent you (the borrower) from saving money by minimizing the amount of interest you pay over the life of your loan.

Warning #3: Out-of-Control Interest Rates

In general, your credit score will determine the kind of interest rates you can expect to pay – higher scores yield lower interest rates. But even for those with weak credit, some interest rates are unacceptably high.

  • Credit cards: Rates for cards vary widely, but many fall within the 15 – 22 percent range. If you’re paying much more than this, especially because of universal default or unannounced changes to your terms, you may need to contact your creditor.
  • Payday loans: These short-term, high-interest loans are infamous for having excessive interest rates. Yearly costs can be as much as 400%, which is why many states have introduced or passed legislation restricting them.
  • Credit card cash advances: These typically have wild interest rates – and are often mailed with your bill to look like personal checks. Avoid them if at all possible.

Warning #4: Large Print and Very Small Print

Be wary of exciting “bargains” advertised in big print.

They’re usually followed by disclaimers, exceptions, costs, fees and more.

This may not be the most aggressive predatory lending technique, but it can trick those who aren’t paying careful enough attention.

Luckily, part of the Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights includes regulations for font size in credit card agreements.

--Have you already been "bamboozled by banks"? Learn about filing bankruptcy

Monday, March 23rd, 2009

Warning Signs of Predatory Lending

Predatory lending can devastate consumers.

Predatory loans can come in the form of credit card agreements, mortgages, payday loans and even bank loans.

Although there’s no surefire way to make sure a loan you get is safe, but here are some warning signs that your lender is less than trustworthy.

Lack of Transparency: Any time the terms of your loan are unclear, beware. Some loans come with terms so lengthy and dense with legal jargon that the average borrower has no way of understanding them (think of your credit card agreement).

Hidden Interest: Loan-related costs with names like “fee” or “charge” are often just interest in disguise. These can take the form of “overdraft charges” from a bank, “fees” on a payday loan, or “service charges” on a credit card.

Hidden Add-ons: Some unscrupulous lenders will sneak extra services into a loan’s terms (e.g. home appraisal fees with a mortgage) without telling the borrower that such services may be available elsewhere for less money.

Outright Lies: Writing a borrower’s “stated income” and similar tricks amount only to lying on a loan form. The only way to be certain that information in your loan documents is accurate is to fill them out (or double-check them) yourself.

Redlining: Aiming loans at specific groups of people is illegal. Studies have found that subprime loans disproportionately affected women, racial minorities, less educated people and the elderly. Other groups may be targeted for other types of predatory lending.

Exorbitant Interest: Sometimes, lenders conceal how much interest they’re charging by revealing only short-term interest rates (as with credit card offers) or by disguising interest (see above). Payday loans, for example, can come with a yearly interest rate of more than 300 percent!

The Magic of Negotiation

One way to make sure you aren’t victimized by predatory loans is to know as much as you can about them – that way, you can walk away when warning signs pop up. But keep in mind, too, that part of understanding lending is understanding that almost everything is negotiable.

Asserting yourself by trying to get a lower interest rate or a discount of some kind can signal to lenders that you know what you’re doing and will not be taken in by predatory tactics. Just be sure to do some research first so you know a reasonable rate to request.

Learn more about filing bankruptcy and how it may lessen your financial stress.

Tuesday, May 15th, 2007

NPR Addresses Subprime Abuses

NPR recently interviewed past employees of subprime mortgage broker Ameriquest, and even with all of the information that's come during the current mortgage foreclosure crisis, some of the stories are shocking.

Former employees describe the company not just failing to mention payment increases and upward adjustments in mortgage rates, but directly telling consumers that their mortgage rates would not increase, and in some cases even concealing adjustable rate mortgage documents in a stack of paperwork with fixed rate terms described on the first page.

National Urban League President Marc Morial tied homeownership to personal wealth, greater economic empowerment, and closing the gap between blacks and whites in the United States when he described six major policy recommendations designed to minimize obstacles standing in the way of many Americans owning their own homes.

The obstacles the National Urban League Homebuyer's Bill of Rights seeks to overcome are:

  • Lack of net savings for downpayments and closing costs
  • Lack of information on how to shop for homes and apply for loans
  • Lack of quality affordable units in livable locations; and
  • Lack of consumer protection

In recognition of skyrocketing mortgage foreclosure rates across the country, particularly in economically depressed areas where homebuyers are more likely to have been saddled with unfavorable non-traditional mortgage terms, Morial said, "It is not enough to put more Americans into their own homes if we fail to arm them with the tools needed to sustain homeownership."

The National Urban League Homebuyer's Bill of Rights makes six policy recommendations designed to overcome these obstacles:

  1. The Right to Save for Homeownership Tax-Free
  2. The Right to High-Quality Homeownership Education
  3. The Right to Turth and Transparency in Credit Reporting
  4. The Right to Production of Affordable Housing for Working Families
  5. The Right to be Free from Predatory Lending; and
  6. The Right to Aggressive Enforcement of Fair Housing Laws