Attorneys: Join Our Network

Federal Court: New Bankrutpcy Law Provision is Unconstitutional

Last week, a federal appeals court in St. Louis ruled that a provision in the 2005 Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (BAPCPA) is unconstitutional because it violates the free-speech rights of lawyers, preventing them from fully counseling their clients who may be considering filing bankruptcy.

Bankruptcy laws are designed to provide relief and protection to individuals struggling with debt. Learn how bankruptcy laws can help you by speaking with a local bankruptcy lawyer.

The new bankruptcy law provision specifically stated that debt relief agencies were prohibited from counseling potential bankruptcy filers on accumulating additional debt to relieve their financial problems.

At issue was whether attorneys are considered "debt relief agencies", and, if so, if they were entitled to give legal advice to their clients that might include incurring more debt.

The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis said that lawyers were indeed "debt relief agencies;" however, the provision was unconstitutional as applied to them, according to the ruling.

It further stated that sometimes it might be beneficial for clients considering bankruptcy to acquire more debt, citing examples of a debtor who needs to buy a car to get to work or someone who could refinance their mortgage to receive a lower interest rate.

"There are certain situations where it would likely be in the assisted person's, and even the creditors', best interest for the assisted person to incur additional debt in contemplation of bankruptcy," said the ruling.

Although similar challenges to BAPCPA are making their way through lower court systems, the ruling is the first of its kind from a federal appeals court on the BAPCPA provision.

It is expected that this matter will be taken all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

A partial dissenter told The Wall Street Journal that the law should only ban legal advice that is "intended to abuse the protections of bankruptcy laws," thereby avoiding constitutional issues. A spokesperson for the U.S. Department of justice told the newspaper that the department is reviewing the decision.

If you are considering filing bankruptcy, don't hesitate to contact a bankruptcy attorney. Connect to a local sponsoring bankruptcy lawyer by completing the below form.

Subscribe


» Back to Bankruptcy Articles


PAID ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT: This Web site is a group advertisement. It is not a lawyer referral service or prepaid legal services plan. Total Bankruptcy is not a law firm. The sole basis for the inclusion of the participating lawyers or law firms is the payment of a fee for exclusive geographical advertising rights. Total Bankruptcy does not endorse or recommend any lawyer or law firm who participates in the network. It does not make any representation and has not made any judgment as to the qualifications, expertise or credentials of any participating lawyer. The information contained herein is not legal advice. Any information you submit to Total Bankruptcy may not be protected by attorney-client privilege. All photos are of models and do not depict clients. All case evaluations are performed by participating attorneys. An attorney responsible for the content of this Site is Kevin W. Chern, Esq., licensed in Illinois with offices at 25 East Washington, Suite 510, Chicago, Illinois 60602. To see the attorney in your area who is responsible for this advertisement, please click here.

If you live in Alabama, Florida, Missouri, New York or Wyoming, please click here for additional information.

By an Act of Congress and the President of the United States, we are a federal Debt Relief Agency. Attorneys and/or law firms promoted through this Web site are also federally designated Debt Relief Agencies. They help people file for relief under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Disclosures Required Under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.